|
Mar 25, 2005
Reuters / Beijing
In 1998, after deforestation caused the Yangzi river to burst its banks, costing 2,500 lives and billions of dollars in damage, China's government got serious about trees. It issued orders to protect healthy forests, rehabilitate distressed ones and replant many woodland areas cleared for farmland. It cracked down on illegal loggers. Could it be, conservationists whispered, that a combination of tragedy and self-interest had forced a great emerging consumer to go green?
Alas, the answer is no. While claiming that a sustainable timber industry, able to meet the nation's needs, was its goal, the government slashed tariffs on imported timber. As imports have soared, so have corruption and incompetence within the sector; stipulated checks on the provenance of imported rough-cut logs are often neglected or inadequate. While praising China's efforts to manage its forests better, the same conservationists say it is the main hub of a global trade in illegal timber.
The government, of course, denies it. One of its departments, the State Forest Administration (SFA), which recently completed a five-year survey of China's forests, claims the country's consumption and production of timber are neatly balanced, and that it will continue meeting its need for wood from its own forests for the foreseeable future. According to one senior SFA official: “It is out of the question that the country would satisfy its domestic demands by increasing tree felling from neighbouring countries.”
Yet, according to conservationists, China is already importing vast quantities of timber, much of which is illegally harvested. And even if that were not true, China's predicted growth—at an average of 8% over the next five years—suggests that it soon would be.
A British-based green group, the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA), says that China imported 1m cubic metres of logs in 1997, and 16m cubic metres in 2002. The country currently consumes 17 times less wood per capita than America, but that figure is expected to shrink. By 2010, according to the World Wildlife Fund, China will be able to meet only half of its demand for industrial wood from domestic supplies.
It is impossible to estimate what proportion of the timber China imports is illegally harvested. Yet cases of abuse are numerous and well-documented, involving timber from Russia, Myanmar and Brazil among other culprits. In a new report, EIA describes a timber-smuggling chain that each month brings 300,000 cubic metres of merbau, a valuable hardwood, from Indonesia's Papua province, to the Chinese port of Zhangjiagang. With most of its forestry already felled, Indonesia bans most exports of timber. Yet according to the EIA, illegal logging is rife in Papua thanks to collusion between Indonesia's army and certain Malaysian logging gangs there.
Chinese conservationists say the logs from Papua are shipped to China with falsified Malaysian paperwork, which Chinese customs officials are unable to verify. To end the racket, they suggest Malaysia's customs should give notice to their Chinese counterparts when legal shipments of logs leave their shores.
But ending the illegal shipments would come at no small cost to China. A short distance from Zhangjiagang lies a small town called Nanxun, which five years ago produced only modest amounts of wooden floorboards. The town now hosts 500 floorboard factories and some 200 sawmills which, according to the EIA, together process one merbau log every minute of every working day.
Many of Nanxum's boards are sold domestically. But some also end up back at sea, being exported to Europe and North America. To end the illegal trade would take help from governments in those regions, and would sadly involve their citizens paying more for their polished floorboards.
The story was published on March 23 in The Economist magazine. |
|